index
plans
freesfthings
norcalmusicscene
music ::
radio
propaganda
csgeek
archive
trip
about
contact
google
m-w
skmdc ::
rot
kexp ::
96k
woxy ::
64k ::
97X boards
rville ::
daily
tothevolcano
monosyllabic
mighty girl
subtle sweetness
radioslack
dtmhlm
flavorpill SF
economist
reason ::
h&r
lileks
instapundit
virginia postrel
tim blair
volokh
kausfiles
matt welch
samizdata
drudge
corner
best of the web
blowing smoke
mark steyn
daily kos
homestar
wfmu blog
pitchfork
gostanford
the onion
sa
Search entries:
Search web:
[Previous entry: "Still More Russian Humor"] [Main Index] [Next entry: "87% Palestinians support martyrdom operations"]
Several people have remarked on the increased number of people on the web writing about Israel and the Palestinians. Count me, in. It's not that the Israeli propaganda sleeper cells have been called in to action by the "Zionist controlled American media" (although I'm sure someone's advancing that theory over at indymedia). Rather, we're fed up with suicide bombing as a political tactic and the pathological convulsions of logic which supporters use to justify it. That's why, when I see things like this, it (to use an Americanism) chaps my hide:
Question: "Is this [ed. Israeli action]a specific response to the Netanya operation?"
Arafat: "Great! All this in response to the Netanya operation?..."
Now perhaps it's just a muddled translation, but it seems like a word which might be mistakenly translated as "operation" could not also be translated as "event", or "unfortunate occurrence", or "suicide bombing". So, if Arafat calls it an "operation", then he apparently doesn't think it's an abberation. Now why should we make any effort to keep him in power?
11:39 AM PST